Tulip Fever

Tulip Fever

 
2.2
 
0.0 (0)
0   1   0   0   0
Write Review
Tulip Fever

Movie Information

Movie Title
TULIP FEVER
Release Date
Movie Rating
Plot Summary
A young, married woman falls in love with the man commissioned to paint her portrait while everyone around them goes crazy over tulips
What do you get when you put a bunch of Oscar-winning actors in a period piece that has the feeling that it might have been written by Shakespeare, but in reality the writing is a hot mess?

You get TULIP FEVER, a.k.a, a crappy movie.

This is one of those films where you can't blame the actors. They did the absolute best with the junk that they were given. Having to hear Christoph Waltz talk about his "little soldier" in a serious way rather than the smarmy, obnoxious, holier-than-thou, Waltz characters we all know and love is really quite off-putting.

At first I was intrigued by the Shakespearean style with the near misses and tragic misunderstandings, but as the film wore on I began to realize that the writer and director were throwing everything they could into the plot. Things got so complicated that major plot points were never developed or allowed at least to be understood.

Watching this film is a lot like watching a tulip grow. It's a long, boring process, but in the end, instead of getting a beautiful bloom we get a dead, withered, useless film.

I would like to know why this movie was shelved for over a year after completion, but honestly, I don't care enough to take ten minutes to figure it out. This film is worth minimal effort at best.

Editor review

(Updated: September 04, 2017)
Overall rating 
 
2.2
I Loved This Movie 
 
2.0
Acting 
 
4.0
Directing 
 
1.0
Effects or Cinematography 
 
3.0
Plot 
 
1.0
Music 
 
2.0

Redwine's Review

Movie Review

Review
What do you get when you put a bunch of Oscar-winning actors in a period piece that has the feeling that it might have been written by Shakespeare, but in reality the writing is a hot mess?

You get TULIP FEVER, a.k.a, a crappy movie.

This is one of those films where you can't blame the actors. They did the absolute best with the junk that they were given. Having to hear Christoph Waltz talk about his "little soldier" in a serious way rather than the smarmy, obnoxious, holier-than-thou, Waltz characters we all know and love is really quite off-putting.

At first I was intrigued by the Shakespearean style with the near misses and tragic misunderstandings, but as the film wore on I began to realize that the writer and director were throwing everything they could into the plot. Things got so complicated that major plot points were never developed or allowed at least to be understood.

Watching this film is a lot like watching a tulip grow. It's a long, boring process, but in the end, instead of getting a beautiful bloom we get a dead, withered, useless film.

I would like to know why this movie was shelved for over a year after completion, but honestly, I don't care enough to take ten minutes to figure it out. This film is worth minimal effort at best.
Was this review helpful to you? 

User reviews

There are no user reviews for this listing.
Already have an account? or Create an account